Annuities

An annuity is an insurance contract that provides a flow of periodic income payments, either for a specific period of time or for the remainder of your lifetime. They are commonly used for planning retirement. There are several different types:

Fixed Annuities

provide predetermined fixed payments over the chosen time period.

Variable Annuities

allow for the invested principal to fluctuate based on underlying investment subaccounts chosen. A Registered Index-linked Annuity (RILA), for example, is tied to indexes like the S&P 500 and offers partial downside protection through a buffer or floor that absorbs some losses — but you can still lose money in a sharp decline. In exchange, the upside is capped. A fixed indexed annuity, by contrast, protects principal fully but usually caps the upside more tightly.

Immediate Annuities

start payments immediately after a lump sum is handed over.

Deferred Annuities

go through an accumulation phase before annuitization and payments begin.

To initiate an annuity, an investor either makes a lump-sum payment upfront or a series of payments over time which are allowed to grow on a tax-deferred basis.

While annuities are not right for everyone, they can provide some compelling benefits:

Lifetime Income Stream

Annuities can contractually guarantee a steady stream of income that the investor cannot outlive.

Tax-Deferred Growth

Funds within certain annuities grow tax-deferred until withdrawn at retirement.

Principal Protection

Fixed and fixed-indexed annuities offer principal protection against market downturns.

Estate Planning

Some annuities can bypass probate and transfer directly to beneficiaries.

Annuities split cleanly into two categories that have almost nothing in common. Income annuities — the Single Premium Immediate Annuity (SPIA) and its deferred cousin the QLAC — are pure-income contracts that pay a lifetime stream and exist primarily for longevity hedging. Accumulation annuities — variable annuities (VA), fixed-indexed annuities (FIA), and RILAs — are commission products wrapped in a tax-deferral shell, sold for the wrapper, not for the income stream. The first category is a serious financial planning tool; the second is mostly a load-bearing distribution channel for the carrier and the agent. Treat them as different products and resist letting the agent blur the distinction.

SPIA, mortality credits, and the annuity puzzle. A single-premium immediate annuity converts a lump sum into a contractual lifetime income stream. The payment rate is materially higher than the after-tax yield of a bond ladder of the same duration — 6%–8% of premium annually at age 70, vs. 3%–4% sustainable from a bond portfolio — not because the carrier earns more on the underlying assets but because of mortality credits. Each year, the insurer redirects the premium of the annuitants who died to the survivors; the survivors collect their own yield plus the deceased’s share. For an individual who lives past life expectancy, the SPIA dominates a self-managed bond ladder; for one who dies early, the bond ladder leaves the residual to heirs while the SPIA does not (unless a period-certain or refund rider was elected, which absorbs the mortality credit). Economically, income annuities dominate self-managed bond ladders for the longevity-hedging objective; this is the classic “annuity puzzle” — the gap between economic theory’s strong endorsement and the near-zero retail uptake. The right structure is partial annuitization of the bond sleeve to cover the floor of essential retirement spending, with the rest of the portfolio left invested for growth and bequest.

Buy the floor in tranches instead of all at once. Because the payout rate is driven by mortality credits, it climbs steeply with age: the same premium buys materially more income at 75 than at 70, and more again at 80. That argues for building the floor sequentially, not annuitizing a single large sum at retirement. Buy a first tranche when the guaranteed income gap actually opens, then add tranches every few years as fixed spending inflates and the payout rate improves. Three benefits fall out of the same decision. You capture the rising mortality credit instead of locking in the worst rate you will ever be offered. You spread the purchase across interest-rate environments, since a SPIA quote is substantially a bet on the rate on the day you sign. And you stay under the state guaranty association’s per-carrier limit (section “State guaranty fund limits.”), which is the reason to split even a single year’s purchase across two insurers instead of concentrating it with one.

Joint life is the widowhood hedge, and it is worth the lower payment. A single-life contract on the higher earner pays more per dollar of premium, which is exactly why couples choose it and exactly why they should not. The survivor’s finances deteriorate on a schedule: household Social Security drops to the larger of the two benefits, the return moves to single brackets with half the width, and IRMAA thresholds halve alongside them (section “The Widow’s Penalty”). A single-life annuity stops at the same moment. Structure the floor as joint and survivor so the guaranteed income is flat across the first death, and treat the lower initial payment as the premium for insuring the one financial event in retirement that is certain to happen to one of you.

One arithmetic consequence of building a floor at all, and it changes how the withdrawal rate should be read. Once guaranteed income covers essential spending, the portfolio is funding discretionary spending only, and the withdrawal rate should be computed against that residual, not against the total budget. A 5% draw that pays for travel and gifts is a categorically safer number than a 5% draw that pays for property tax and insurance, because the first can be cut in a bad year without changing how you live and the second cannot. Retirees who compare a single portfolio-wide rate against the 4% guideline are measuring the wrong thing.

QLAC for IRA deferral. A Qualified Longevity Annuity Contract is a deferred-income annuity purchased inside an IRA or 401(k) with a maximum of $210,000 (2026 indexed limit) per person; the QLAC purchase amount is excluded from the IRA balance for RMD purposes, deferring the corresponding RMD until annuity payments begin (no later than age 85). For retirees facing a large RMD wall in their seventies and beyond, the QLAC shifts taxable income out of the high-tax years and into the later cognitive-decline-protection years where the income stream is also functionally useful. The decumulation chapter (section “The RMD Wall and How to Deflate It”) covers the integration with the RMD wall; the relevant fact here is that the QLAC is a feature of the underlying SPIA contract, not a separate product.

The one accumulation annuity worth a look: the MYGA. The blanket dismissal above has an exception. A Multi-year guaranteed annuity is the insurance industry’s answer to a certificate of deposit: a fixed rate, guaranteed for a stated term of typically three to ten years, with no market exposure, no sub-accounts, no rider menu, and no meaningful commission drag visible to the buyer — the yield you are quoted is the yield you get. It competes directly with a CD or a Treasury of the same maturity, and it often wins on one specific axis.

That axis is taxation. Interest inside a CD or a Treasury is taxed annually whether or not you spend it; interest inside a MYGA compounds tax-deferred under IRC §72 until you withdraw. For a top-bracket household holding fixed income in a taxable account — the position the asset-location rules of section “Asset Location: Two Refinements That Change the Answer” try hardest to avoid but that plenty of readers cannot escape — deferral on ordinary-income interest is worth real money, and at the end of the term a IRC §1035 exchange rolls the contract into a new one without triggering the gain.

The costs are the usual annuity costs, and you should confirm each before buying. There is no FDIC backstop; your protection is the carrier’s balance sheet and the state guaranty association, whose limits are lower than most buyers assume (section “State guaranty fund limits.”), which argues for splitting large sums across carriers instead of reaching for the last twenty basis points at a weak one. Surrender charges apply for the full term, usually with a free-withdrawal allowance of around 10% a year. Gains come out as ordinary income, not capital gain, and on a LIFO basis — earnings first. And a withdrawal before 59½ adds the 10% penalty of IRC §72(q) on the gain, which makes a MYGA a poor place for money you might need early. Buy one when the money is genuinely long-term, taxable, and earmarked for fixed income; do not buy one because an agent described it as “a CD, but better.”

Variable annuities: the fee teardown. A typical variable annuity stacks four expense layers: Mortality and Expense (M&E) charge at 100–140 basis points annually, administrative fee at 10–40 basis points, sub-account expense ratios at 60–120 basis points (vs. 5–15 basis points for the equivalent ETF), and rider fees for guaranteed minimum withdrawal/income/death benefits at 80–150 basis points each. The total drag commonly clears 3% annually, before any surrender charge. The tax-deferral benefit — gains compound inside the wrapper, taxed as ordinary income on withdrawal — needs an equity-like real return for 15–20 years to overcome the fee load. Over the same period, a taxable brokerage account holding tax-managed index funds typically wins, because long-term capital gains rates are lower than ordinary, qualified dividends are taxed favorably, and the step-up at death erases the embedded gain entirely. The agent presenting the VA does not typically run this comparison.

State guaranty fund limits. Annuity contracts are not FDIC-insured; the backstop is the state guaranty association of the policyholder’s state of residence. Coverage limits vary by state and product type but commonly run $250,000 per insurer for the present value of annuity benefits (some states higher — New York and a few others reach $500,000; Washington covers up to $500,000). For a SPIA sized at $1M+, fragment the premium across multiple carriers to keep each contract within the guaranty limit. p | https://www.nolhga.com/ublishes the per-state limits; check before committing.

Advisor commission and the conflict. SPIA and other income annuities pay the selling agent 2%–5% of premium up front. Deferred and variable annuities pay 5%–10%, and some structured-product annuities pay over 10%. The commission is recovered through internal charges and surrender penalties; you do not see it as a deduction from the premium, but it exists. A fee-only advisor on a flat retainer who recommends a SPIA from a no-commission carrier (e.g., TIAA, or through a fiduciary-only platform like ) | https://www. incomesolutions.com/ is structurally aligned; an insurance agent paid on first-year commission is not. Get a second opinion on any annuity recommendation that comes from a commissioned channel.

Annuities as cognitive-decline insurance. A property the sales pitch rarely surfaces: an annuity with no cash value — a pure income contract with no surrender feature — is structurally hard to drain. The lump sum that funded it no longer exists as a withdrawable asset; the contract issues a stream of payments and that is all. A scammer who gains control of your accounts cannot wire away an asset that is not in any account. A cognitively impaired future version of you cannot make the catastrophic single decision that empties the brokerage, because there is no brokerage balance to empty. For retirees facing the realistic late-life risk of either elder fraud or diminished judgment (section “Late-Life Vulnerability: The Plan for Diminished Judgment”), converting a portion of the portfolio into income-only annuity coverage is a hedge against attack surface, not longevity. The trade is permanent illiquidity on the converted sleeve; the gain is that no single bad day or bad call empties it.